How is the midpoint of a saved partner-age range calculated?
The midpoint is the center of the saved acceptable range, calculated by adding its minimum and maximum ages and dividing by two. A saved range of 26–30 has a midpoint of 28...
Search question titles, tags and concise answers. Search pages are noindex so arbitrary query URLs do not enter search indexes.
101 answers found
The midpoint is the center of the saved acceptable range, calculated by adding its minimum and maximum ages and dividing by two. A saved range of 26–30 has a midpoint of 28...
The typical result was a median midpoint gap of −2.0 years across 3,129 analyzed profiles. In other words, the middle saved range was centered two years below the profile h...
The median saved age-range width was seven years, showing that the typical analyzed profile used a span rather than one exact partner age. Half of the profiles had widths a...
Yes. The saved partner-age range included the profile holder’s own age for 1,993 of 3,129 analyzed profiles, or 63.7%. Within the full cohort, 33.9% had a similar-age-cente...
“Centered similar age” means the midpoint of the saved partner-age range fell within two years below or above the profile holder’s age. Formally, the midpoint gap was betwe...
Among 2,596 men’s profiles, 55.5% had ranges centered younger, 33.3% centered similar, and 11.2% centered older; the median midpoint gap was −2.5 years. Among 533 women’s p...
Own-age inclusion declined as profile age increased. It was 83.8% among profiles aged 18–24, 64.6% at 25–29, 53.1% at 30–34, and 32.4% at 45 and above. The median midpoint...
The displayed Weddme cohorts for Lahore, Islamabad, and Rawalpindi all had the same median midpoint gap of −2.0 years. Their median own ages and range widths were not neces...
Saved preferences are search parameters recorded before any confirmed marriage outcome. They describe a set of ages a profile allowed during discovery, while a spouse-age g...
An age range may reflect search breadth, a family discussion, social expectations, onboarding choices, or a practical attempt to avoid excluding profiles too early. The dat...
The product’s 51+ category has no fixed upper limit, but midpoint and width calculations require a maximum. The main analysis capped it at 60, which could have distorted re...
Non-contiguous selections appeared in only 17 profiles, equal to 0.54% of the full 3,129-profile analytical cohort. Among the narrower group of 1,378 profiles that selected...